Congress shake-up helps Obama on climate change
By John M. Broderand Brian KnowltoRepresentative Henry Waxman of California ousted Representative John Dingell of Michigan from his chairmanship of the influential Committee on Energy and Commerce on Thursday, giving President-elect Barack Obama an advantage in his plans to promote efforts to combat global warming.
By a vote of 137 to 122, House Democrats ended Dingell's nearly 28-year reign as his party's top member on the committee, which also deals with two other key aspects of the Obama agenda: energy and health care. Besides installing a committed environmentalist atop the committee, the outcome removes one of the auto industry's best friends from a key leadership post.
"It's not personal," said Representative Jan Schakowsky of Illinois, a Democrat who spoke on Waxman's behalf. "It's about the American people demanding that we embrace change and work with the president on critical issues of climate change and energy and health care."
But while that outcome favored Obama, the president-elect's transition team, still huddled in private meetings in Chicago, continued to undergo an awkward public airing of some of its expected cabinet nominations.
A day after former President Bill Clinton said he would do "whatever they want" to remove any obstacles that his extensive business and philanthropic involvements might pose for the nomination of his wife, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, as secretary of state, the state of negotiations over the position remained in flux, and tensions between the two sides appeared to have sharpened.
Related Articles
Today in Americas
If Clinton accepts the secretary of state post, Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts - the 2004 Democratic nominee for president - is poised to take the chairmanship of the Foreign Relations Committee. If she turns it down, he is considered a strong possibility to head the State Department.
Democrats with knowledge of the transition process said that Governor Janet Napolitano of Arizona was poised to be offered the position of homeland security secretary.
Napolitano, 50, was previously that state's attorney general and is known for her work on immigration and other law-enforcement issues. She was one of the first Democratic governors to support Obama's candidacy.
Earlier reports said that Penny Pritzker - a Chicago businesswoman, longtime friend of Obama's and national finance chairman of his campaign - was in the final stages of vetting for commerce secretary.
But the Chicago Tribune said that Pritzker had issued the following statement Thursday: "Speculation has grown that I am a candidate for secretary of commerce. I am not. I think I can best serve our nation in my current capacity: building businesses, creating jobs and working to strengthen our economy. It has been my great privilege to serve in the Obama campaign."
Pritzker was a chief architect of Obama's record-breaking fund-raising efforts. But some of her business dealings - her family's financial empire includes the Hyatt hotel chain and many other ventures - seemed likely to raise tough questions in any confirmation process.
She helped run an Illinois bank involved in turning subprime loans into securities, the risky practice at the heart of the financial crisis. The bank collapsed after regulators discovered accounting irregularities.
Should she withdraw, it would spare Obama an almost certain confirmation battle. Already, his vows to limit potential conflicts of interest among his appointees seem sure to be tested, as with his selection of a former senator, Tom Daschle, for secretary of Health and Human Services.
At issue is Daschle's work since leaving the Senate four years ago as a board member of the Mayo Clinic and a highly paid adviser to health care clients at the law and lobbying firm Alston & Bird.
The potential conflicts between a Secretary of State Clinton and a globally involved former President Clinton might be even larger, were it not for Bill Clinton's promise to step back from problematic activities and submit others to ethics screening. Other questions remained to be resolved on Thursday, however.
Obama and Hillary Clinton must still decide whether they can put the rancor of their long and bitter primary battle behind them.
Both sides were engaged in a delicate public and private dance, maneuvering for position and reputation in case the deal falls through. Aides in each camp have grown increasingly sour toward the other in recent days as the matter has played out publicly. Some in the Obama camp are bristling at what they see as strategic leaks by the Clintons aimed at boxing in the president-elect and forcing him to offer the post.
The tension could foreshadow a complex relationship burdened by suspicion and enmity should Hillary Clinton become secretary of state. By putting her in the cabinet, Obama could remove a potential thorn in the Senate on issues like health care and a potential rival for the nomination in 2012 if his term proved rocky. But he could also face a rival power center within his own administration with her on his team.
Waxman topples Dingell; House Dems go greener
WASHINGTON (AP) — Democrats steered the House toward more aggressively tackling global warming and other environmental problems Thursday, toppling veteran Michigan Rep. John Dingell, a staunch supporter of Detroit automakers, from an important energy panel in favor of California liberal Rep. Henry Waxman.
The switch could help President-elect Barack Obama on Capitol Hill with one of his favored issues: trying to curb global warming by limiting greenhouse gas emissions. But Waxman's combative stance on climate change and other issues also could alienate Republicans and moderate Democrats, making it harder to get the bipartisan support Obama will need.
Waxman is an avid environmentalist and booster of health care programs — and a home-state ally of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. He defeated Dingell on a 137-122 vote in the Democratic Party caucus, capping a bruising intraparty fight.
The Energy and Commerce panel is one of the most important House committees, with sweeping jurisdiction over energy, the environment, consumer protection, telecommunications and health care programs such as Medicaid and the popular State Children's Health Insurance Program.
Dingell has been the top Democrat on the panel for 28 years and is an old-school supporter of Detroit's carmakers and other big industries such as electric utilities. His bitter battles with Waxman over clean air issues date to the Reagan administration and were recently revived as Waxman complained that the committee has been too slow to address global warming.
Dingell comes from an era of autocratic committee chairmen and has had to adapt to a House in which power is consolidated around Pelosi, who has clashed with him in the past. Last year, in a move that undercut Dingell's power on the global warming issue, she created a special panel led by Massachusetts Rep. Edward Markey to make the case for bigger reductions in greenhouse gases. Pelosi did not publicly take sides in the new vote, but her support of Waxman was well known and played a role in the strong tally.
Waxman was the candidate of change in a year dominated by that theme. He likened the first years of the Obama administration to a once-in-a-generation opportunity to get things done in Washington.
"The argument we made was that we needed a change for the committee to have the leadership that will work with this administration and members in both the House and the Senate in order to get important issues passed in health care, environmental protection, in energy policy," Waxman said after the vote.
Dingell congratulated Waxman in a statement issued after the vote, and promised to work closely with him on a smooth transition and on the issues before the committee. He said his commitment to his constituents will not change.
"That commitment to protecting and creating jobs, to providing health care for all Americans, to working to getting our state and nation's economy back on track is a fight I will continue to wage in Washington," Dingell said.
Waxman, 69, has a lengthy congressional resume of aggressive investigations and legislative action.
Dingell's reputation for putting Detroit's auto interests above all else didn't help his campaign to keep his job — especially as automakers seeking a bailout have been taking a public relations pounding on Capitol Hill.
His defenders said he had done nothing to deserve being dumped, pointing to a long list of accomplishments and the panel's busy workload over the past two years, including successfully enacting an energy bill that would raise automobile fuel economy standards to 35 miles per gallon by 2020.
Driving Waxman's bid was the issue of global warming, a top issue for Obama. Waxman is expected to move legislation with tougher emissions standards than Dingell would have.
Environmentalists say Dingell has acted too slowly on global warming. A bill he released last month was a poke in the eye to Waxman and Pelosi, D-Calif., since it would prevent states, including California, from setting tougher auto emissions standards than the federal government.
"Waxman's victory is a breath of fresh air — of clean air. It was a stunning defeat for the corporate lobbyists on K Street," said Frank O'Donnell, president of Clean Air Watch. "It shows that a majority of the House Democrats are ready to work with the incoming Obama administration on effective global warming legislation."
Still, taking on global warming will be anything but a cakewalk. A controversial "cap and trade" mechanism in which permits are sold is tantamount to a huge tax on carbon dioxide emissions and will face resistance from coal state Democrats and moderate party members — to say nothing of Republicans.
"This decision sends a troubling signal from a majority that has promised to govern from the center," said House GOP leader John Boehner of Ohio. "They moved away from Chairman Dingell because he is committed to approaching energy and environmental issues in a manner that protects American jobs."
Bill Kovacs, a vice president at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said Dingell brought a balanced and methodical approach to environmental policy and sought the input of the regulated industries.
It's the difference of "one trying to keep everyone in the system and one knowing exactly where they want to go and how they are going to get there," Kovacs said.
Associated Press writer Dina Cappiello contributed to this report.
